First time originator's guide to securitisation
16 min read
Originators can use securitisation to achieve a lower cost of funding than from other debt products and to remove securitised assets from their balance sheet. Securitisation plays an important role in facilitating liquidity and risk management, allowing originators to diversify funding sources, mitigate balance sheet risks and optimise capital allocation. Through unlocking asset value and improving market liquidity, securitisation can contribute to economic growth, facilitate access to capital for businesses and support financial stability.
Securitisation is a form of structured financing, whereby the credit risks associated with a specific pool of assets are segregated from the originator’s own credit risks. This is typically achieved by establishing a special purpose vehicle (“SPV”), which purchases the asset receivables from the originator and subsequently issues securities against these asset receivables to investors. The SPV then disburses principal and interest payments to investors using receipts generated by the underlying assets. By structuring the SPV to hold only the securitised assets, distinct from the originator’s group, the originator’s credit risks are isolated from those linked to the underlying assets. The originator will, however, maintain customer relationships (with customers not being notified, in the ordinary course, of the securitisation).
How to establish a securitisation
An originator’s treasurer or CFO, when considering securitisation as a funding tool, may consult with debt advisors or relationship banks to obtain insights into the market and likely pricing/funding economics. An originator’s first securitisation is usually established with a single bank as a private funding facility, giving the originator an opportunity to benefit from lower funding costs. A number of banks are willing to provide flexible variable funding that allows funding to be drawn over time, similar to a revolving credit facility.
Different banks provide funding on different terms, and originators must consider different banks’ proposed offerings and agree a structure and term sheet that works for the business.
Originators will rely on their advisors to negotiate the structure, termsheet and underlying documentation – securitisations are almost never done on a bank’s standard terms, and an originator needs to ensure the terms it agrees to are workable even as the business grows, and in both good and challenging times.
Every originator’s assets are different, and putting together a securitisation requires work by both the originator and funding bank in diligencing the assets, including by looking at historical data.
Securitisation investors regard asset performance data as very important, and as the originator’s business matures (and origination volumes grow) and increasing data becomes available, investors are typically willing to invest on more favourable terms.
Other points of focus in establishing a securitisation include the cash management and collection account arrangements used by the originator and the terms and conditions applicable to the securitised assets. Investors will also typically seek to assure themselves that the way in which the originator deals with underlying customers is consistent with law, regulation and general market standards.
Ultimately, originators may establish a securitisation structure whereby asset backed securities are offered to a range of institutional investors in the public markets, similar to a bond issuance. These structures can give originators the benefit of a very low cost of funding, but require more disclosure, a minimum transaction size and (almost invariably) credit ratings, and are typically only used after an originator has securitised its assets privately for a number of years.
Types of securistation and the underlying assets involved
'Securitisation' encompasses a variety of structures tailored to the specific characteristics of the underlying assets and the preferences of originators and investors. These structures differ in their complexity, risk profiles and regulatory treatment. Some common structures include:
Traditional securitisation
Traditional securitisation – summarised in the introductory paragraph above - involves the transfer of a pool of asset receivables to an SPV. The SPV issues securities backed by these asset receivables to investors. Cash flows from the underlying assets, including principal and interest payments, are used to service the securities. This structure allows originators to monetise illiquid assets and diversify funding sources.
Synthetic securitisation
Synthetic securitisation involves the transfer of credit risk associated with a pool of assets without transferring the underlying assets themselves. This could be by the use of credit derivatives or financial guarantees. Synthetic securitisation can be used for risk management, regulatory capital relief or to create bespoke investment products.
A first time originator would be unlikely to enter into a synthetic securitisation, which is typically used by banks to free up regulatory capital (rather than to obtain funding). Accordingly, synthetic securitisation is beyond the scope of this briefing.
Whole business securitisation
Whole business securitisation involves the securitisation of cash flows generated by an entire business operation, rather than specific assets. This structure is often used by utilities and companies in industries such as hospitality, healthcare or franchising to monetise future revenue streams.
Underlying assets
A wide array of assets can be securitised, with the most typical being:
- residential and commercial mortgages;
- personal loans and auto loans;
- commercial or trade receivables;
- corporate loan portfolios; and
- credit cards.
Other less common asset classes that have been securitised in the UK include, among others:
- lease and rental receivables;
- IP royalty receivables;
- insurance premiums;
- healthcare receivables;
- ticket receivables;
- receivables from public utilities;
- mobile handset loan receivables; and
- student loan receivables.
Where the asset pool is limited to financial assets, such as mortgages, auto loans or credit card receivables, the securities issued by the SPV are commonly referred to as ‘asset-backed securities’ or ‘ABS’. These securities are often structured with different tranches, each offering varying levels of risk and return. ABS may be further classified based on the type of underlying assets, such as residential or commercial mortgage-backed securities (‘RMBS’ and ‘CMBS’, respectively), collateralised loan obligations (‘CLOs’) and collateralised debt obligations (‘CDOs’).
Main parties to a securitisation and their roles
Securitisations involve a number of key parties. The following section provides an overview of the parties involved in a traditional securitisation structure.
Originators
The originator is the entity which originates or creates the underlying assets that will be securitised. Originators are typically financial institutions such as banks, mortgage lenders or consumer finance companies, but can also be large corporates.
Debtors
Debtors are the counterparties of the originator in relation to the underlying assets, such as the borrower under a mortgage. The debtors will be obligated to periodically pay amounts to the originator on the terms of the underlying asset, which obligation constitutes a receivable. These receivables form the pool of assets which are transferred to the SPV.
Servicer
The servicer is responsible for administering and servicing the underlying assets, which includes collecting payments from debtors, managing delinquencies and defaults, and distributing cash flows to investors. The servicer may be the originator or one of its affiliates or (less commonly) a third-party entity with expertise in asset servicing. Often a back-up servicer is also appointed to ensure a suitable experienced and creditworthy entity will continuously service the underlying assets throughout the life of the securitisation.
Servicers are paid a servicing fee, which is intended to be sufficient to attract a replacement servicer if necessary.
Issuer (SPV)
The issuer is the legal entity established specifically for the purpose of securitising the assets and issuing the securities to be sold to external investors. The issuer will have limited activities and liabilities beyond the securitisation transaction and typically will also be isolated from the originator’s group to ensure it is “bankruptcy remote” (such that it is unlikely to become insolvent merely because the originator has become insolvent and the originator’s creditors will not have access to the issuer’s assets in the event of the originator’s insolvency).
Sponsors
Although not included in the diagram above, some securitisation structures may include a sponsor, which is commonly a highly rated affiliate of the originator. The sponsor acts as a key intermediary between the originator and the investors, by initiating the securitisation process and coordinating various aspects of the transaction (including legal and regulatory compliance, due diligence and disclosure). The sponsor may also provide credit enhancement to increase the marketability of the issued securities.
Investors
Investors are the main creditors under a securitisation, as they purchase the issued securities and thereby provide funding. In return, they will receive periodic payments of principal and interest from cash flows generated by the securitised assets. Investors typically include sufficiently sophisticated persons such as financial institutions, pension funds, insurance companies, asset managers, hedge funds, large corporates and (less commonly) high-net-worth individuals. The risk and return profile of the securities attract investors seeking fixed-income investments with levels of credit risk and yield which vary with the seniority of the security and the nature of the underlying assets.
Note trustee
The note trustee is appointed on behalf of the investors and is usually a trust corporation or financial institution with a dedicated trustee department. In UK and European securitisations, a note trustee will generally only take an active role where modifications are required to the transaction documentation or to declare a default and accelerate the securities where directed by the investors.
Some securitisation transactions utilise alternatives to the traditional trustee structure, such as a fiscal agent arrangement or owner trust, which can offer different levels of oversight and control.
Security trustee or security agent
The security trustee or security agent holds the benefit of the security interests created in the securitisation on behalf of the secured parties (which includes the investors). They are typically an affiliated entity of the note trustee.
Swap counterparties
Swap counterparties are engaged to manage certain risks associated with the securitisation, such as interest rate or currency risks. Interest rate swaps (or caps) or currency swaps may be used to hedge against fluctuations in interest rates or foreign exchange rates, thereby mitigating potential adverse impacts on cash flows and investor returns. In the case of currency swaps in particular, they also allow for the securities to be issued in a different currency to the underlying assets (often US dollars, in order to attract US investors). Swap counterparties may include financial institutions, hedge funds or other entities with expertise in derivatives trading.
Legal counsel
Legal counsel play a critical role in structuring, negotiating and documenting the securitisation transaction, and will provide advice on compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Legal counsel ensure that the transaction is structured efficiently and is compliant with market standards and best practices.
Other parties and advisors
Various other parties and/or advisors may be appointed or involved in a securitisation transaction depending on commercial need and the complexity of the structure. For example, other parties and advisors may include arrangers, investment managers, underwriters, clearing systems, accountants and rating agencies.
Key transaction documents
Securitisation transactions require a suite of core documents to provide for the rights, obligations and relationships among the various parties involved. These documents serve to define the structure of the transaction, establish the legal framework and govern the rights and responsibilities of each party. Key documents include:
Sale agreement
The sale agreement governs the transfer of the asset receivables from the originator to the issuer. It provides for the terms and conditions of the sale, including the purchase price, representations and warranties and any conditions precedent to closing.
Servicing agreement
The servicing agreement governs the servicing of the underlying assets by the servicer. It sets out the rights and obligations of the servicer, including the collection of payments in relation to, and administration of, the receivables, the management of delinquent and defaulted accounts and the provision of information relating to the underlying assets to the issuer and investors.
Offering memorandum / prospectus
The offering memorandum or prospectus (which is essential in a public transaction, but not required for a private transaction) is a regulatory and marketing document that provides potential investors with detailed information about the transaction, including details about the originator and the other transaction parties, the characteristics of the underlying assets, the structure of the securities being offered, the risks associated with the investment and the terms and conditions of the securities.
Subscription agreement
The subscription agreement governs the purchase of securities by the initial investors (who will often be the financial institutions which arrange the transaction). It sets out the terms and conditions of the investment, including the purchase price, the number and type of securities being acquired, and any representations and warranties made by the investor.
Trust deed
The trust deed governs the relationship between the issuer, the note trustee and the investors. It provides for the obligations of the issuer and the rights of the investors, including the payment of principal and interest under the securities, the allocation of cash flows from underlying assets and the procedures for default and enforcement.
Security agreement
Under the security agreement, the issuer grants security over the asset receivables and their proceeds in favour of the secured parties (which includes the investors).
Swap agreements
Swap arrangements, such as interest rate swaps (or caps) or currency swaps, may be used to hedge against interest rate or currency risks associated with the securitisation transaction. These arrangements are governed by separate agreements that outline the terms and conditions of the swap, including payment obligations and termination provisions.
Legal opinions
Legal opinions may be provided by legal counsel to opine on the validity, enforceability and legality of the transaction documents and the securitisation structure as a whole, the incorporation and capacity of the transaction parties, the transaction’s compliance with applicable regulatory requirements (discussed further below) and certain key structural features such as “bankruptcy remoteness”.
Overview of the legal and regulatory framework and key legal points
Securitisation transactions are subject to a comprehensive regulatory framework governing various aspects of securitisation transactions, including structuring, disclosure, risk management and investor communication. Key pieces of regulation from a UK perspective include:
- the Securitisation Regulations 2024 (SI 2024/102) (as amended);
- the securitisation part (“PRASR”) of the Prudential Regulatory Authority (“PRA”) Rulebook (for PRA-regulated entities);
- the securitisation sourcebook (“SECN”) of the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) Handbook (for non-PRA regulated entities);
- Financial Services and Markets Act 2000;
- UK Market Abuse Regulation[1];
- UK Prospectus Regulation[2];
- UK Capital Requirements Regulation[3] (for banks); and
- UK Solvency II[4] (for insurers).
The UK Securitisation Regulations, PRASR and SECN (together, the “UK Securitisation Framework”[5]), the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and the UK Market Abuse Regulation (as well as the UK Capital Requirements Regulation and UK Solvency II in respect of relevant entities), as enforced by the FCA and PRA, aim to protect investors by promoting due diligence, transparency and risk retention.
Risk retention
The UK Securitisation Framework requires originators to retain a 5% minimum net economic interest in securitisations to ensure the alignment of interests and proper risk management. This retention can be achieved through various permitted methods (such as retention of a vertical slice of exposures, a first loss tranche and maintaining exposure to a random selection of assets).Disclosure and periodic reporting
In addition to the regulatory requirements governing prospectuses and offering memoranda under the UK Prospectus Regulation (applicable to public securitisations), the UK Securitisation Framework mandates specific disclosure requirements for all (public and private) securitisation transactions. These include disclosure of asset-level performance data, transaction documents and investor reports. Originators and issuers are jointly responsible for providing this information, with the originator often designated to fulfil the requirements in practice. For public securitisations (where a prospectus is required), the information must be made available through an authorised securitisation repository. For private securitisations, this information is generally accessible to investors and relevant authorities.
EU Regulation
At present the EU securitisation regulations[6] contain very similar risk retention and disclosure requirements for originators. Some originators may in practice need to comply with both UK and EU regimes in order to attract funding from a wider range of providers and, in these cases, originators will need to consider carefully and take more detailed legal advice as to the risk of future divergence between the UK and EU regimes.
Advantages and challenges associated with securitisations
Securitisation offers unique advantages to originators, and the opportunity to obtain a lower cost of funding than through other debt products. Securitisation allows for the isolation of the originator’s credit risks from those linked to the underlying assets. This separation ensures that investors primarily bear the credit risks associated with the underlying assets (rather than the originator’s business generally). In addition, through the tranching of the securities issued into different classes of varying seniority through the securitisation process (and particularly where credit enhancement is utilised), the risks associated with the underlying assets are mitigated, making the securities (particularly the more senior classes of securities) attractive to more risk-averse investors and thereby lowering funding costs for the originator.
Furthermore, by transferring the asset receivables to an SPV, an originator effectively removes the securitised pool of assets from its balance sheet, reducing gearing and freeing up capital for additional investment. Another advantage of securitisation is its ability to unlock liquidity in respect of illiquid assets.
However, while securitisation offers potential advantages to originators, navigating its complexities poses challenges. Establishing and maintaining a securitisation structure is inherently a document-heavy process and requires the gathering and analysis of historical asset-level data and the ongoing disclosure of asset-level performance information, which can be expensive and time-consuming. The complex legal and regulatory framework creates further obstacles, particularly where a transaction is structured with multi-national components.
A first-time originator may also have to alter its business practices (for example, separate collection accounts may need to be established to ensure the cashflows on the assets are separated from the originator’s cashflow), update its standard terms and conditions (for example, to ensure the asset receivables can be assigned to the SPV) and even hire new people or advisers (either to lead on the establishment of the securitisation structure of ensure ongoing reporting and other requirements are complied with). The whole process can involve an increased level of scrutiny (from investors, rating agencies, lawyers, accountants and other advisers) of, and changes to, long-standing practices (albeit often for the better).
Ultimately, the decision to pursue securitisation will depend on individual business needs, with the benefits of the mechanism weighed against the associated costs and completion timelines. Despite the challenges, securitisation remains a valuable tool in structured finance, offering unique advantages for originators.[1] Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 as it forms part of the domestic law of the UK by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (the “EUWA”). Relevant for issuers of UK-listed securities.
[2] Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 as it forms part of the domestic law of the UK by virtue of the EUWA (as amended and supplemented by rules and guidance of the FCA).
[3] Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as it forms part of the domestic law of the UK by virtue of the EUWA.
This material is provided for general information only. It does not constitute legal or other professional advice.